Tengo la siguiente cadena JSON que se recibe de una parte externa.
{
"team":[
{
"v1":"",
"attributes":{
"eighty_min_score":"",
"home_or_away":"home",
"score":"22",
"team_id":"500"
}
},
{
"v1":"",
"attributes":{
"eighty_min_score":"",
"home_or_away":"away",
"score":"30",
"team_id":"600"
}
}
]
}
Mis clases de mapeo:
public class Attributes
{
public string eighty_min_score { get; set; }
public string home_or_away { get; set; }
public string score { get; set; }
public string team_id { get; set; }
}
public class Team
{
public string v1 { get; set; }
public Attributes attributes { get; set; }
}
public class RootObject
{
public List<Team> team { get; set; }
}
La pregunta es que no me gusta el "atributoclase "y el" nombre del campo de atributos "en la clase Team. En cambio, quiero que se nombre como" TeamScore "y también que elimine" _ "de los nombres de campo y dé los nombres correctos.
JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<RootObject>(jsonText);
Puedo cambiar la clase "Atributo" a "TeamScore", pero si cambio el nombre archivado (atributos en la Clase de equipo), no se deserializará correctamente y me dará un valor nulo. ¿Cómo puedo superar esto?
Respuestas
450 para la respuesta № 1Json.NET tiene un JsonPropertyAttribute que le permite especificar el nombre de una propiedad JSON, por lo que su código debe ser:
public class TeamScore
{
[JsonProperty("eighty_min_score")]
public string EightyMinScore { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("home_or_away")]
public string HomeOrAway { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("score ")]
public string Score { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("team_id")]
public string TeamId { get; set; }
}
public class Team
{
public string v1 { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("attributes")]
public TeamScore TeamScores { get; set; }
}
public class RootObject
{
public List<Team> Team { get; set; }
}
Documentación: Atributos de serialización
74 para la respuesta № 2
Si desea utilizar el mapeo dinámico y no desea saturar su modelo con atributos, este enfoque funcionó para mí
Uso:
var settings = new JsonSerializerSettings();
settings.DateFormatString = "YYYY-MM-DD";
settings.ContractResolver = new CustomContractResolver();
this.DataContext = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<CountResponse>(jsonString, settings);
Lógica:
public class CustomContractResolver : DefaultContractResolver
{
private Dictionary<string, string> PropertyMappings { get; set; }
public CustomContractResolver()
{
this.PropertyMappings = new Dictionary<string, string>
{
{"Meta", "meta"},
{"LastUpdated", "last_updated"},
{"Disclaimer", "disclaimer"},
{"License", "license"},
{"CountResults", "results"},
{"Term", "term"},
{"Count", "count"},
};
}
protected override string ResolvePropertyName(string propertyName)
{
string resolvedName = null;
var resolved = this.PropertyMappings.TryGetValue(propertyName, out resolvedName);
return (resolved) ? resolvedName : base.ResolvePropertyName(propertyName);
}
}
3 para la respuesta № 3
Agregando a la solución Jacks. Necesito deserializar usando JsonProperty y Serialize mientras ignoro JsonProperty (o viceversa). ReflectionHelper y Attribute Helper son solo clases de ayuda que obtienen una lista de propiedades o atributos para una propiedad. Puedo incluir si a alguien realmente le importa. Usando el siguiente ejemplo, puede serializar el modelo de vista y obtener "Cantidad" a pesar de que JsonProperty es "Precio recurrente".
/// <summary>
/// Ignore the Json Property attribute. This is usefule when you want to serialize or deserialize differently and not
/// let the JsonProperty control everything.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
public class IgnoreJsonPropertyResolver<T> : DefaultContractResolver
{
private Dictionary<string, string> PropertyMappings { get; set; }
public IgnoreJsonPropertyResolver()
{
this.PropertyMappings = new Dictionary<string, string>();
var properties = ReflectionHelper<T>.GetGetProperties(false)();
foreach (var propertyInfo in properties)
{
var jsonProperty = AttributeHelper.GetAttribute<JsonPropertyAttribute>(propertyInfo);
if (jsonProperty != null)
{
PropertyMappings.Add(jsonProperty.PropertyName, propertyInfo.Name);
}
}
}
protected override string ResolvePropertyName(string propertyName)
{
string resolvedName = null;
var resolved = this.PropertyMappings.TryGetValue(propertyName, out resolvedName);
return (resolved) ? resolvedName : base.ResolvePropertyName(propertyName);
}
}
Uso:
var settings = new JsonSerializerSettings();
settings.DateFormatString = "YYYY-MM-DD";
settings.ContractResolver = new IgnoreJsonPropertyResolver<PlanViewModel>();
var model = new PlanViewModel() {Amount = 100};
var strModel = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(model,settings);
Modelo:
public class PlanViewModel
{
/// <summary>
/// The customer is charged an amount over an interval for the subscription.
/// </summary>
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "RecurringPrice")]
public double Amount { get; set; }
/// <summary>
/// Indicates the number of intervals between each billing. If interval=2, the customer would be billed every two
/// months or years depending on the value for interval_unit.
/// </summary>
public int Interval { get; set; } = 1;
/// <summary>
/// Number of free trial days that can be granted when a customer is subscribed to this plan.
/// </summary>
public int TrialPeriod { get; set; } = 30;
/// <summary>
/// This indicates a one-time fee charged upfront while creating a subscription for this plan.
/// </summary>
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "SetupFee")]
public double SetupAmount { get; set; } = 0;
/// <summary>
/// String representing the type id, usually a lookup value, for the record.
/// </summary>
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "TypeId")]
public string Type { get; set; }
/// <summary>
/// Billing Frequency
/// </summary>
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "BillingFrequency")]
public string Period { get; set; }
/// <summary>
/// String representing the type id, usually a lookup value, for the record.
/// </summary>
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "PlanUseType")]
public string Purpose { get; set; }
}
1 para la respuesta № 4
En expansión Rentering.com "s respuesta, en escenarios donde una gráfica completa de muchoslos tipos deben ser atendidos, y está buscando una solución fuertemente tipada, esta clase puede ayudar, vea el uso (fluido) a continuación. Funciona como una lista negra o una lista blanca por tipo. Un tipo no puede ser ambos (Esencia - también contiene la lista global de ignorar).
public class PropertyFilterResolver : DefaultContractResolver
{
const string _Err = "A type can be either in the include list or the ignore list.";
Dictionary<Type, IEnumerable<string>> _IgnorePropertiesMap = new Dictionary<Type, IEnumerable<string>>();
Dictionary<Type, IEnumerable<string>> _IncludePropertiesMap = new Dictionary<Type, IEnumerable<string>>();
public PropertyFilterResolver SetIgnoredProperties<T>(params Expression<Func<T, object>>[] propertyAccessors)
{
if (propertyAccessors == null) return this;
if (_IncludePropertiesMap.ContainsKey(typeof(T))) throw new ArgumentException(_Err);
var properties = propertyAccessors.Select(GetPropertyName);
_IgnorePropertiesMap[typeof(T)] = properties.ToArray();
return this;
}
public PropertyFilterResolver SetIncludedProperties<T>(params Expression<Func<T, object>>[] propertyAccessors)
{
if (propertyAccessors == null)
return this;
if (_IgnorePropertiesMap.ContainsKey(typeof(T))) throw new ArgumentException(_Err);
var properties = propertyAccessors.Select(GetPropertyName);
_IncludePropertiesMap[typeof(T)] = properties.ToArray();
return this;
}
protected override IList<JsonProperty> CreateProperties(Type type, MemberSerialization memberSerialization)
{
var properties = base.CreateProperties(type, memberSerialization);
var isIgnoreList = _IgnorePropertiesMap.TryGetValue(type, out IEnumerable<string> map);
if (!isIgnoreList && !_IncludePropertiesMap.TryGetValue(type, out map))
return properties;
Func<JsonProperty, bool> predicate = jp => map.Contains(jp.PropertyName) == !isIgnoreList;
return properties.Where(predicate).ToArray();
}
string GetPropertyName<TSource, TProperty>(
Expression<Func<TSource, TProperty>> propertyLambda)
{
if (!(propertyLambda.Body is MemberExpression member))
throw new ArgumentException($"Expression "{propertyLambda}" refers to a method, not a property.");
if (!(member.Member is PropertyInfo propInfo))
throw new ArgumentException($"Expression "{propertyLambda}" refers to a field, not a property.");
var type = typeof(TSource);
if (!type.GetTypeInfo().IsAssignableFrom(propInfo.DeclaringType.GetTypeInfo()))
throw new ArgumentException($"Expresion "{propertyLambda}" refers to a property that is not from type "{type}".");
return propInfo.Name;
}
}
Uso:
var resolver = new PropertyFilterResolver()
.SetIncludedProperties<User>(
u => u.Id,
u => u.UnitId)
.SetIgnoredProperties<Person>(
r => r.Responders)
.SetIncludedProperties<Blog>(
b => b.Id)
.Ignore(nameof(IChangeTracking.IsChanged)); //see gist